![]() |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
T A O P A T T AThe Acts of Peterand the Twelve Apostles | ||||||
Non-Christian Ascetic Allegory and Hellenic Parody ?having renounced all actions by the mind dwells at ease in the City of Nine Gates, neither working nor causing work to be done. --- Bhagvad Gita 5:13
| A Collection of Academic Comments
Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia
![]() | ||||||

A Collection of Academic Comments |
|---|
The following is taken from:
The Nag Hammadi Library in English
By James McConkey Robinson, and consists of the
introduction written to the work by its two translators:
Compares TAOPATTA to Lucian's True Story.
According to Schenke, the figure (Lithargoel) may have existed
as a Jewish Angel, "something similar to a Jewish Asclepius".
Extracted from
Dissertations of the University of Groningen
- Theology and Religious Studies
Apostolic commission narratives in the canonical
and apocryphal Acts of the Apostles
---- Czachesz, István (2002)
INTRODUCTION:
Instead of reporting the teachings and miracles of an apostle,
the narrative concentrated on the commission of the twelve apostles.
The text resembles fairy tales and is filled with symbols.
The narration changes back and forth between the first and third persons,
the first person narrator being identified as Peter.
P.156 - Journey to Nine Gates
p.158 - TAOPATTA and Pachomian Monasticism
Pachomius, the father of coenobite monasticism, organised communities
from c.323 to his death 346 CE in Upper Egypt. The monastic rules in their fullest
form are via the Latin translation of Jerome. These rules characterise
Pachomian monasticism of the fourth century.
Parallels are explored between the text of TAOPATTA
and these Rules of conduct.
p.165
"If we remain tranquil in our monasteries preserving
in prayer and psalms, and if we do not press upon the
people of the world, then God will rouse those very
people [...] and compel them [to] furnish our bodily
needs gladly" [35]
[35] Nilus of Ancyra, Ascetic Discourse 3.58 (Caner)
"To the internal evidence of the text, we add the widespread view
that the Nah Hammadi codices themselves were manufacturued and
used in a Pachomian monastry. [36]
[36] Wisse, "Gnosticism and Early Monasticism in Egypt"
p.166
SUMMARY of POINTS:
1) The narrative of TAOPATTA can be understood as an allegorical
tale about the monks' renunciation of the world.
2) The text handles some typical administrative issues of cenobite
monasticism in a similar way as the Rules of Pachomius.
3) TAOPATTA address the sociological conflicts of monasticism
that also influence the hagiographic literature
4) The central character of the book might have been inspired by
the figure of Pachomius that was surrounded by legendary tradition
soon after his death (346 CE).
5) Use of the text in the Pachomian monasteries fits into the larger
theory of the production and use of the NH codices in that milieu.
Conclusion
Several features of TAOPATTA make it plausible that the final
redaction of the book took place in Upper Egypt in a Pachomian
monastery between 347 and 367. [40]
p.167
Relation to Other Apostolic Acts
Acts of Philip in Asia Minor
The parallels between the two books ... can be explained
with the help of a third text, which perhaps was identical
with one of the sources of TAOPATTA. [43]
[43] Molinari identifies three sources:
1) story of the pearl merchant
2) the resurrection appearance
3) the author's theology.
"In TAOPATTA Jesus appears as a physician in the figure of Lithargoel.
In TAOP (The Acts of Philip) all three motifs occur abundantly.
Philip prays "Physician of our inner man, ...."
See also ... The healing of Charitane, the daughter of Nicoclides
p.170
"Another feature that connects TAPATTA with the Acts of John
(as well as with the Acts of Thomas) is the presence of polymorphy.
Here plymorphy is presented as metamorphosis, the subsequent
appearance of Jesus in various forms. The subsequent appearances
are related to different stages of the disciples' journey, and
the disciples do not recognise Jesus until they arrive at their
destination. The spiritual journey described in the text leads
to the true vision of Jesus.
p.170/171
General Conclusions
1. TAOPATTA written in a Pachomian monastery between 347 and 376 CE.
2. Most of the symbolic motifs are rooted in that monastic milieu.
3. One of its sources had contacts with The Acts of Philip
4. Both incorporate motif of John as mediator betwen Jesus and disciples.
5. The plot of TAOPATTA is quite different from that of other apostolic acts
6. Instead it contains one long commission narrative, describing a journey
through the stages of contemplative ascetic life.
7. It is not a biography, rather a biographical program,
an abstract model for imitation.
8. It does not seem to be an introduction to a longer text,
but rather a self contained allegorical tale
about divine call to an ascetic and spiritual life.
Described as a Dénouement: In literature, a dénouement consists of a series of events that follow a dramatic or narrative's climax, thus serving as the conclusion of the story. Conflicts are resolved, creating normality for the characters and a sense of catharsis, or release of tension and anxiety, for the reader. Etymologically, the French word dénouement is derived from the Old French word denoer, "to untie", from nodus, Latin for "knot." Simply put, a dénouement is the unraveling or untying of the complexities of a plot.
