Aether Tectonics Exploration of a new way of looking at space and matter and light by Ross Tessien
Quanticizing Gravity
Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia in the Southern Autumn of 1996

Date: 18 Jun 1996 02:31:59 GMT
From: tessien@oro.net (Ross Tessien)
Organization: Impulse Engineering, Inc.
Newsgroups: sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag, sci.physics.particle, sci.skeptic
Subject: Quanticizing Gravity

In article <31c56c2c.56554c43414e@vulcan.xs4all.nl>,
johanw@vulcan.xs4all.nl says...

Why is it outrageous that there is no consistent theory of quantum gravity?

Paul Budnik wrote:

If QM wants to be complete it will have to cover for the conditions at the Planck scale, where gravity can't be neglected. So at least something about the subject has to be researchable, even if you claim that at that scale no physical laws at all would apply.

Perhaps both problems are connected? If so, just working on one side of the matter would be an inefficient, even ineffective, way of solving the problems. But as usual, this question can only be answered afterward.

Ross Tessien contibuted the following:

I score high on the crackpot scale but it seems all very simple to me according to the model I am studying. There is an extremely simple fact about both QM and GR. They both act at the scale of sub atomic matter or smaller. If this were not true, then there would be variances in force actions based on the shape of a body since the force would be damped on passing through it. (ie, for gravitation, a body of a certain mass would weigh different amounts if it had different shapes, and this is not observed. QM would have similar effects for charge density variances).

So, all of these forces we use in the Standard model, and this curvature of space in GR apply to the sub atomic matter.

But lets not forget that there is a scale at which for some reason there is a form of shielding that we measure. This is the scale of the nucleus. Hydrogen has a certain mass per proton, iron another an U yet another forming the binding energy curve for the elements. If all protons were the same in the outside world, then we can legitimately consider the effect of combining protons and neutrons as being a shielding from outside sources of energy to force their property we call mass (at least we can make this proposal based on my model. I don't think the SM tells us why the mass per proton is less at iron, it is just a fact. If I am incorrect here please correct me and refer me to some source material, thanks).

In any case, we already consider matter as resonant standing waves in QM by using Schroedingers equations in a number of circumstances. So, if we wrote out an equation of space as a rectilinear standing wave that was meshed with the particles standing wave, where both are resonances of the same material medium, then we have something. What we get is two standing waves that are meshed and pulsating.

Something very important happens. Because both are resonances in the same medium, they interact to curve the mediums geometry. In other words, the waves in the medium that are matter, and the waves in the medium that are space, depend on and are altered by, each other. This is what GR is like where the gravitational energy appears on both sides of the equation and leads to the curvature of space and of time. (I separate them because to me space are the nodes, and time is the period of pulsation of spaces standing wave nodal structure.)

One can move relative to the other, but if there is to be an acceleration, there must be a change in their relative resonant frequencies. If you consider that space derives its wave equation from energy arriving from stars, planets, and distant galaxies all combined, then we are not going to change the resonant frequency of space, or the combined quality of its standing wave due to the huge amount of energy.

It would be much easier to change the resonant frequency of the particle we want to accelerate. In doing so, we would change the rate of that particles motion relative to the structure of spaces wave function.

Watch what happens if you do this. First of all, I am meshing the structure of space with the standing wave structure of the particle. That sounds like what happens in that inertia acts to maintain the constant velocity of a particle. Here inertia is being defined as the meshing of the two standing waves (space and particle).

What then is "spacelike" and "timelike"? Space like is when you freeze the pulsations of the nodal structure of space, and then you move a particle from one location to another. But you must expand and contract the particle through the stationary nodal structure to get from here to there.

If you count the number of nodes you passed, then you can tell how far you went.

Time like then is when you remain in one place, in one node, and you let the entire structure of space resonate and you count how many times your particle had to expand and contract during that transition from one time to the next.

Did you notice? To move in either time or space required the particle to make the same pulsating motions as are outlined in Schroedingers wave equation as best I can tell.

What then is Light like? This is motion through the nodes where you shift your resonance to be half coupled to "space" and half coupled to "time" pulsations. This is like surfing the waves propogating through the quantum vacuum (not space since space is the nodal structure that is the resultant of that wave propogation)

But there is a very important thing about this concept in that it has gravitation fall out of the geometry of the waves moving through space and exerting quantum mechanical interactions.

Phase errors are injected as you move from nuclear dimensions to interatomic dimensions (ie nuclear to electric force transition in the wave action amplitude). And for wave energy arriving from distant space, you get frequency errors due to relative motion. That energy gives you a second mechanism for interference and can be considered to be the source of gravitation. The low amplitude is then due to the great distance that energy had to travel in order to get here. The greater the frequency error, the greater the force that would be applied, but that energy had to come from a greater distance and so the amplitude is lower, but the total volume of a spherical shell at that large radius is huge, so the number of sources is large.

That is a long way of saying that it seems like the interference from distant sources would be independent of the age of the universe due to the offsetting effects of the expansion on the frequency interference of matter here and now.

The thing that is neat, is that there is a reason for each force to be there, due to a single mechanism, wave interaction between two standing waves at the sub atomic and smaller scales, ie the QVF.

Another interesting thing is that wave energy transmitted out of phase with the manifold particle resonances would not interact in a constructive or destructive manner. It would just pass on through until it converged in phase at a later time and place. That would be "imaginary" energy. Such concepts are used in both QM and GR, but this model gives a real physical reason and requirement for there actually being such a thing as imaginary energy and virtual particles and many other observations that are consistent with our current models.

All that is really done, in my model, and in my opinion, is to assume that the quantum vacuum really is there. If you do this, then you must begin to ask questions about what shapes and what structures exist (since you assumed they exist you must then try to find out what they look like and how they work). QM refuses to give such a statement any creedence. I say that this is like the ostrich with its head in the sand.

If you assume that there is a structure to the QVF, and then look for it, two possibilities arise;

1) It is there and you may or may not find it.

2) You will never look so you will never find it.

Therefore, there is only one of the two possibilities above that offers you a chance of learning about the structures. That is the method I am trying to pursue via geometric solutions to wave mechanical structures that move in and through a material aether medium.

The funny thing is, by doing this I have been time and again finding things happen and then later reading in Penrose or Hawking or Feynman about certain things that sound just like the geometries I have found in my model. Some day I hope to understand this well enough to present these concepts in a book so that my dribble above makes sense to those who cannot see inside my head to look at the images I am working with.

If you remember anything I have said above, keep in mind the concept of treating space like a nodal standing wave structure just like matter. And, keep in mind the concept of interference of one standing wave with incoming energy. ie, phase errors corresponding to electric field interactions and frequency shifted arriving energy corresponding to gravitational fields.

All this means is to look at the source of the energy and there will be phase errors for energy transmitted through space and frequency errors from oscillations that were emitted by a moving object, ie distant galaxies.

Well, have a good day.

Later,

Ross Tessien
There exist in nature, no attractive forces.

Index Document - Theories of Aether

---

	Aether Tectonics Exploration of a new way of looking at space and matter and light by Ross Tessien
Quanticizing Gravity
Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia in the Southern Autumn of 1996