Mountain Man's Global News ArchiveSolar Harmonics & Planetary Orbits by Ray Tomes
Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia - Southern Summer 1996
| |
---|
Solar Harmonics & Planetary Orbits |
---|
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 12:03:48 GMT
From: rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz (Ray Tomes)
Organization: KC Computer Services
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories, sci.physics
Subject: Solar Harmonics & Planetary Orbits
As an example, it has been found that there are strong solar oscillations of period 160 minutes and many between 5 and 6 minutes. If you calculate the internodal distance of these periods as electromagnetic waves (half the wavelength) the answers turn out to be 9.6 and 0.33 astronomical units respectively.
This is a simple calculation:
160 minutes * 60 seconds/minute * 299792 km/second / 149.6*10^6 km/a.u
[period]--- * [convert to secs] * c --> wavelength [convert to a.u.]
Because the internodal distance is half the wave, we divide the above result by 2 to arrive at an internodal distance of 9.6 astronomic units for the 160 minute periodic fluctuations, and 0.22 astronomic units for the shorter fluctuations.
Very strong indirect evidence for such long electromagnetic waves is that the outer planets (Saturn to Pluto) are near multiples of 9.75 au from the sun and the inner ones (Mercury to Mars) at multiples of 0.35 au. from the sun. It seems that the distances or periods have changed slightly since the solar system formed but that the planets did form at the nodes of standing electromagnetic waves which have the same periods as solar oscillations. This is quite remarkable, and needs to be highlighted:
The Outer Planets & the 9.75 a.u. nodes
Planet | Saturn | Uranus | Neptune | Pluto
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
| n*9.75 au | 9.75 | 19.5 | 29.25 | 39.0
| Actual distance | 9.5 | 19.2 | 30.1 | 39.4
| |
---|
Can it be disputed that these 4 outer planets are at near multiples of 9.75 a.u. from the sun?
The Inner Planets & the 0.35 a.u. nodes
Planet | Mercury | Venus | Earth | Mars
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
| n*0.35 au | 0.35 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 1.40
| Actual distance | 0.39 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 1.52
| |
---|
Can it either be disputed that the distribution of the inner planets are near multiples of 0.35 a.u.? (not quite so near because there are many solar oscillations in the 5 to 6 minute range and so there is quite a lot of modulation of the waves).
For further information
please contact:
-- Ray Tomes -- rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz -- Harmonics Theory --
Web Reference: http://www.vive.com/connect/universe/rt-home.htm
Further to this Thread ... |
---|
Subject: Planet distances and Solar oscillations
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 01:52:16 GMT
From: rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz (Ray Tomes)
In sci.physics lbsys@aol.com wrote:
>So some questions to Ray:
> Did you perform a probability analysis of the patterns being a random distribution?
> What's the result of it, and what's the result, if you include the other planet(s)?
[note: use a non-proportional font such as courier]
All Planets & the dominant data values
Planet Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto
Distance .3871 .7233 1.0000 1.524 5.203 9.539 19.191 30.071 39.457
10.065 /26.00 /13.92 /10.06 /6.61 /1.93 /1.06 *1.91 *2.99 *3.92
5.012 /12.95 /6.93 /5.01 /3.29 *1.04 *1.90 *3.83 *6.00 *7.87
.7335 /1.89 /1.01 *1.36 *2.08 *7.09 *13.00 *26.16 *41.00 *53.79
.3759 *1.03 *1.92 *2.66 *4.05 *13.84 *25.38 *51.05 *80.00 *104.97 |
---|
Now let us convert these distances from au to light minutes
and calculate the wave periods assuming that they are internodal distances
(i.e. half wavelengths).
Conversion from a.u to Wave Period
Distance in a.u. | 10.065 | 5.012 | .7335 | .3759 | (Units)
| Light time equivalent | 83.71 | 41.68 | 6.100 | 3.126 | (light minutes)
| Wave period | 167.42 | 83.36 | 12.200 | 6.252 | (minutes)
| |
---|
It is quite clear that the four figures are actually two pairs,
each pair having a near 1:2 ratio.
It is interesting now to compare these figures to the solar oscillation periods of 160.0 and 5.5+/-0.5 minutes (the range is because there are multiple values mostly in this range). Let us look at these figures on a log scale:
1------2------4--#*--8---*-16-----32-----64-*--126-*#-256 minutes
Note: * denotes period, while # denotes solar oscillations
If the planetary distances are assumed to be essentially random then the four periods derived are also random and the probability of the two solar oscillations matching as well as they each do to one of the periods is about p=.029 which is a modest degree of significance.
It is noticeable that the solar oscillations are both faster than the periods implied by the planetary distances (~5.5 vs 6.2 and 160 vs 167 minutes). If the wave theory of planetary formation is accepted then this difference tells us that either the solar oscillation periods or the planetary distances have altered by 5 to 10% since the planets formed. The most likely change would be in the solar oscillation periods as the sun's temperature would have altered in the last 5 billion years.
It is interesting also that the inner planets (except mars) are at very near exact fractions of the outer planet 10au "wave" and the outer planets are still near multiples of the inner planet 0.37au "wave". I have previously found that the asteroids also favour multiples of this wave.
This is much more satisfying than the usual
Bode's law
because it gives a good reason why the planets form exactly where they do.
-- Ray Tomes -- rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz -- Harmonics Theory --
Web Reference: http://www.vive.com/connect/universe/rt-home.htm
Further to this Thread ... |
---|
From: rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz (Ray Tomes)
To: prfbrown@magna.com.au (Mountain Man)
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 05:18:37 GMT
Subject: solar oscillations and planetary distances
According to this paper the distances were actually in better agreement when the planets were formed.
> The following data represents the published distance at accretion time,
> (some 3 gigayears ago ???, say) are:
Distances at accretion time
Planet Mercury Venus Earth Mars
Distance 0.28 0.65 0.91 1.32 |
---|
It is my suggestion that the planets formed at distances related to the wavelengths of solar oscillations. If we accept the above figures, then they fit quite well to multiples of 0.32 au which is the internodal distance of an e/m wave of period 5.3 minutes. That is in good agreement with the present 5 minute solar oscillations which have most of their energy between 5 and 6 minutes and average 5.5 minutes.
Previously the fit of the outer planets with the solar 160 minute ocsillation was good but the inner planets did not fit the 5 minute oscillation so well. The fact that the inner planets orbit sizes have significantly changed explains the difference.
-- Ray Tomes -- rtomes@kcbbs.gen.nz -- Harmonics Theory --
Web Reference: http://www.vive.com/connect/universe/rt-home.htm
Mountain Man's Global News ArchiveSolar Harmonics & Planetary Orbits by Ray Tomes
Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia - Southern Summer 1996
| |
---|